Over the past ten years, polyester casting tape is becoming more recognized as a valid alternative to its conventional fiberglass counterpart.
There are a variety of studies that have compared these goods in both controlled environments and real-world adventures. For more information about polyester mesh read this article
The results noted that these two options can be equally effective, although there are some additional factors to take into account.
The most significant contrast between polyester and fiberglass casting tape is geared towards general efficacy. A study published in the Journal of the National Association of Orthopedic Technologists in 2002 recorded several factors related to overall efficacy.
The results mentioned that the differences in performance were negligible in most cases. There was an identical amount of substance breakdowns and delamination on weight-bearing surfaces using both polyester and ceramic casting tape. The action level and relaxation levels were similar also.
The one noticeable difference was associated with the growth of fractures. Fiberglass casts were a lot more likely to crack at the toe box area. This was attributed to the increased rigidity fiberglass casting tape provides.
A polyester substrate is far more flexible, which allows it greater flexibility under heavier weights. This causes less cracking and splitting.
From a patient's perspective, there's just one area where polyester casting tape may face problems. Because of the high use of fiberglass casting tape for decades, a few people today expect a more rigid cast.
Although polyester tape has been demonstrated to be quite effective, the understanding that higher rigidity is necessarily better will have to be overcome before fiberglass may be entirely replaced.